Unfair to ban us from pedestrian-only paths, say cyclists as LTA starts enforcement on Jul 1
The Land Transport Authority said that enforcement against those riding on pedestrian-only paths is for the safety of vulnerable pedestrians.
The Land Transport Authority launched a Stay on Track campaign in June 2025 to remind cyclists and pedestrians to keep to their respective lanes. (Photo: 鶹/Erin Liam)
This audio is generated by an AI tool.
SINGAPORE: Some cyclists voiced concerns on the first day of a ban that prohibits them from riding on pedestrian-only lanes, saying the new rule was unfair.
Most of the 15 cyclists and pedestrians interviewed by 鶹 on Tuesday (Jul 1) said they were unaware of the penalties being enforced by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) – where first-time offenders face a fine of up to S$2,000 (about US$1,575) or a jail term of up to three months, or both.
With the ban, bicycles and non-motorised personal mobility devices (PMD) such as kick-scooters are prohibited on lanes adjacent to cycling paths, which have been converted to pedestrian-only lanes.
Personal mobility aids such as mobility scooters and motorised wheelchairs can still be used on pedestrian-only paths within speed limits.
LTA said the move is for the safety of more vulnerable pedestrians such as seniors and children. Pedestrians are technically allowed to walk on cycling paths, but they are encouraged to stick to pedestrian-only lanes.
Many of the cyclists approached, however, told 鶹 that the new rule was confusing and that enforcement should also apply to pedestrians who frequently walk on cycling lanes.
When 鶹 visited pedestrian-only paths in Ang Mo Kio, a few cyclists were still riding on pedestrian-only lanes and many pedestrians strayed onto the cycling paths.
Mr Tan Kay Sing, 81, who cycles more than 20km daily, said: “If you don’t fine the pedestrians, they will walk onto the cycling lane, then where will the cyclists go?”
He also said the current system feels contradictory since cyclists often have to ride on footpaths to avoid pedestrians who are on the cycling paths.
Ms Gwendolyn Chow, 53, who cycles three times a week for leisure, had similar frustrations:“I have no problem keeping to the (cycling) lane. But I think it's not fair that pedestrians, many of them, stray onto the cycling path.”
PMD rider Dayalan Sathasiyam, 47, told of having to keep a lookout for distracted pedestrians who do not watch their paths. “They always look at their phones, but they don’t know what is coming in front of them,” he said, adding that he almost hit a pedestrian once, but managed to brake in time as he was riding slowly.
A 28-year-old food delivery rider who identified himself only as Faikal said the ban was “ridiculous”. He had not heard about the new rules until Tuesday.
“Obviously, I will be careful now, don’t get fined,” he added.
FOR THE SAFETY OF ALL
Singapore has more than 200km of cycling lanes that run parallel to footpaths. Late last year, LTA converted these footpaths into pedestrian-only lanes. The grace period for adjusting to the new rules ended on Jul 1.
Speaking to the media opposite Our Tampines Hub, at a newly converted pedestrian-only path on Tuesday,Minister of State for Transport Baey Yam Keng said that enforcement is always the "last resort".
At the end of the day, it is about the safety of everyone, he said.
"So I hope that everybody, whether cyclists, personal mobility users or pedestrians, can all look out for one another and take care of ourselves," he added.
Mr Steven Lim, the vice-president for safety and education at the Singapore Cycling Federation, told 鶹 that while he can understand the cyclists' frustrations, people should consider how and why these rules are enforced.
In 2016, bicycles and mobility devices were allowed on footpaths following the recommendations of theActive Mobility Advisory Panel.
Almost ten years later, things have changed, with an ageing population and more people riding personal mobility devices, said Mr Lim, who is also a member of the panel.
"So hence came the idea of, why don't we make the footpath next to the cycling path apedestrian-only path, so that you can segregate the two different type of users and in a way, protect each other," he said.
He hopes that the ban is "just the beginning" to shaping better behaviour.
"Hopefully, one day we can all become more gracious, we can be more tolerant towards each other ... and we don't even need to have segregated facilities," he added.
PEDESTRIANS WELCOME BAN
Pedestrians such asMs Regina, a 59-year-old Ang Mo Kio resident, welcomed the enforcement.
“Cyclists are supposed to ride on that side, not this side, but still they will come,” she said as she was walking on the pedestrian lane. She added that she has had to move out of the way several times because of riders who do not stay on the cycling lane.
Ms Joanne Tan, 38, said that pedestrians also have a role to play.“Sometimes, we also walk (on the cycling lane), also our fault,” she admitted, adding that she would try to stick more to pedestrian-only lanes now.
In a fact sheet given to the media on Tuesday, LTA said that its active mobility enforcement officers and volunteers have been engaging and educating active mobility users on the correct path to use since August last year.
The authority also said that it launched a Stay on Track public education campaign last month to remind members of the public to keep to their respective paths.
“Through our multi-prong approach of engagement, education and enforcement, we hope to encourage all path users to play their part in creating a safer and more gracious environment for active mobility.”
